When Work Is Punished: The Tragedy Of America's Welfare State
Exactly two years ago, some of the more politically biased progressive media outlets (who are quite adept at creating and taking down their own strawmen arguments, if not quite as adept at using an abacus, let alone a calculator) took offense at our article "In Entitlement America, The Head Of A Household Of Four Making Minimum Wage Has More Disposable Income Than A Family Making $60,000 A Year." In it we merely explained what has become the painful reality in America: for increasingly more it is now more lucrative - in the form of actual disposable income - to sit, do nothing, and collect various welfare entitlements, than to work. This is graphically, and very painfully confirmed, in the below chart from Gary Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (a state best known for its broke capital Harrisburg). As quantitied, and explained by Alexander, "the single mom is better off earnings gross income of $29,000 with $57,327 in net income & benefits than to earn gross income of $69,000 with net income and benefits of $57,045."
Actually you don't have to read the whole article to 'Weep.'
There are a lot of charts and Scribd presentations included that are used just to back up the introductory paragraph.
This article highlights something I've suspected for a long time, but haven't been able to quantify no matter how I tweaked the Google search. I think the dollar figures are worse than the article states, because State and Local subsidies aren't factored in.
If the Progressives like Obama think that they own the "Envy Card" they're wrong. They had better think twice before they play the class warfare game knowing these figures are finally out in the open.

